FROM THE ARCHIVE
An AI agent needs a job description and a boundary.
Useful autonomy depends on knowing what an agent is allowed to do.
Retrospective editionPrepared for this archive on The edition date identifies its place in the weekly series.
The moment an AI system can take an action, the leadership conversation changes. Preparing a recommendation and changing an operational record carry different responsibilities. I want us to be precise about that difference whenever we discuss an agentic workflow.
Name the action, not just the aspiration
“Help the operations team” is too broad to be a useful mandate. A narrower assignment might be to gather approved documents and prepare a summary for review. We can then describe the sources, the permitted tools, and the expected output. Any authority to send a message or change a record should be considered separately.
NIST’s February 5, 2026 concept paper on agent identity and authorization reflects the importance of these questions. Its focus on identification and authority provides useful context for a business discussion about what an agent may access and do.
Plan for disagreement and exceptions
A sensible design explains what happens when information conflicts, an approval is missing, or the agent cannot complete its task. It should also identify the person who can stop the workflow. I would rather understand one difficult exception than watch ten polished demonstrations that assume everything goes well.
Expand authority with evidence
The approach I favour is to observe a limited workflow, review its behavior, and widen its scope only when the evidence supports that decision. Business and technology owners should make that judgment together. Clear boundaries can make an agent more useful because people understand where it fits. The leadership question is not how independently it can operate in a demonstration, but what responsibility we are ready to delegate in real work.
How Genellipse can help
Cortex AI provides capabilities for building agents with permissions, policy controls, oversight, and activity records. Genellipse can help define a bounded workflow, identify the actions that require approval, and prepare an evaluation using representative cases. We can then assess the integrations and operating arrangements needed before expanding the agent’s role.
FROM PERSPECTIVE TO PRACTICE
Discuss this with Genellipse
