FROM THE FOUNDER’S DESK

Ideas. Perspective. Progress.

Weekly perspectives on technology, partnership, and the business problems worth solving.

46Weekly editions14Languages
Browse all editions

The CEO Reading Room

Book reviews and upcoming selections on leadership, finance, AI, and the human side of progress. Explore the 2026 reading list.

Explore book reviews
Business progress starts with a shared purpose.Weekly editions46

ITC Vegas 2026

Thank you for a successful ITC Vegas

September 29–October 1, 2026Las Vegas, Nevada

Continuing the conversations around insurance transformation, actuarial AI and governed enterprise agents.

Continue the conversation with Genellipse
Browse all editions

FROM THE ARCHIVE

ITC Vegas 2026: turning AI momentum into meaningful insurance outcomes

A successful conference for Genellipse, strong interest in Cortex AI OS and AegisNow, and a practical agenda for AI, agentic workflows, autonomous mobility and lasting partnerships.

Illustrative artwork

I leave ITC Vegas encouraged by the opportunity ahead for insurance and proud of what Genellipse achieved during the conference. The interest in our platforms, the quality of the conversations and the follow-up meetings give us a positive foundation for the work ahead. My strongest takeaway is that the value of AI will be determined by how effectively we connect it to real insurance problems, professional judgment and measurable results.

A successful conference—and a clear next step

For Genellipse, ITC created valuable opportunities to demonstrate our products and understand the priorities of prospective partners. On Day 1, we demonstrated our products to 13 companies and investors. On Day 2, we delivered more than 10 demonstrations and presentations of Cortex AI OS and AegisNow. The interest and subsequent conversations give us a strong foundation for developing meaningful partnerships.

I am particularly pleased with the attention given to Cortex AI OS and our actuarial AI approach. Our next responsibility is to understand each organization’s needs and agree a useful path forward.

Thank you to the organizers, the Genellipse team and everyone who took time to connect. The conference has finished, but the partnerships we want to build require sustained attention, clear commitments and accountability through delivery.

What the public discussion tells us

The published ITC programme placed AI implementation, governance, data and operating change alongside emerging insurance risks. Post-event coverage in The Insurer on October 2 also described a combination of enthusiasm and caution about AI. I regard that combination as healthy: ambition creates opportunity, while scrutiny helps turn investment into dependable capability.

The industry examples below are drawn from the published programme and linked reporting. They are not quotations from speakers or a claim of consensus among insurers. My interpretation is that the next stage of progress will favour organizations that can connect innovation to the complete business process.

What insurers are prioritizing: value, control and adoption

ITC’s session on scaling agentic AI listed leaders from Security Benefit and CSAA alongside Celent and focused on adoption, measurable value, governance and organizational change. A separate session on enterprise orchestration listed representatives from Tokio Marine North America Services and USAA. Its published focus was the connection between automated decisions, human work and operational oversight.

These programme choices suggest that insurers are thinking beyond the quality of an individual AI response. They need to understand how a capability fits their operating model, who owns it and what happens when it encounters a difficult case.

The questions I would bring to a leadership discussion are practical: Which customer or employee problem are we solving? What is the current cost and turnaround time? Who approves consequential actions? Can the team operate the solution after implementation? Those questions help Genellipse and a prospective partner define a shared standard of success.

Agentic AI: making the whole workflow work

An agent becomes useful when it can perform a defined task with the right information and authority. Several agents can support a more complex process, but each additional handoff needs clear ownership, reliable data and a route for exceptions.

Consider an illustrative underwriting workflow. One agent prepares a submission, another identifies missing information, and another assembles relevant evidence for review. The underwriter can then challenge the analysis and make the decision within the organization’s authority framework. A confident AI response should never conceal incomplete evidence.

This is where Cortex AI OS is relevant to our conversations with insurers. We can explore a single agent, a coordinated solution pack or existing agents brought into a common governance approach. API and MCP integration can support controlled access to enterprise systems, with permissions and approval boundaries defined for the actual workflow.

Coming in late October: Cortex Blueprint and Cortex App

In late October 2026, we are introducing Cortex Blueprint and Cortex App as part of Cortex AI. These additions are designed to make agentic AI easier for insurers to adopt and integrate into their existing business processes.

The direction received a very positive response from insurers and carriers at ITC. I see that interest as an encouraging signal: organizations want a practical way to apply agentic AI to the work their teams already perform.

Our focus is ease of use with an approach that respects existing processes, systems and professional responsibilities. As we introduce Cortex Blueprint and Cortex App, we look forward to working with insurance partners to identify suitable workflows, agree integration requirements and define the controls needed for responsible adoption.

Explore Cortex AI

Modernization must respect the systems insurers already run

The programme included a Builders Mutual session on improving claims workflows within existing technology environments. Another discussion, involving Alliant and Principal Financial, emphasized the data and insurance context beneath agentic AI. Together, these topics reinforce a practical point: adoption depends on connecting new capabilities to the information and processes an organization already relies on.

An insurer may have policy records spread across administration systems, finance platforms and recurring batch files. Automating a reconciliation without addressing identifiers, effective dates and data ownership can simply move the same exceptions through the process faster.

Genellipse can help map those dependencies, establish controlled interfaces and improve data quality before expanding automation. GeneData, our architecture and integration services, and AegisNow provide complementary starting points. We agree the solution around the partner’s environment, with modernization sequenced to protect operational continuity.

Autonomous mobility: an opportunity to rethink risk responsibly

ITC’s autonomous-mobility session put an important question on the agenda: how does insurance adapt when software performs driving tasks? This creates opportunities to reconsider risk assessment, evidence collection and the relationships between insurers, technology developers and operators.

Precision matters. NHTSA distinguishes driver assistance that requires an attentive driver from higher levels of automation with different operating requirements. An accident involving technology does not, by itself, establish who is legally responsible; that depends on the facts and applicable law.

My takeaway is that insurers should prepare to understand the system involved, the conditions in which it was operating and the records needed to reconstruct an incident. For Genellipse, the relevant contribution is helping organizations design connected information and governed review workflows, with qualified professionals retaining responsibility for legal and coverage judgments.

Read my Day 2 discussion on autonomous mobility

Actuarial AI and the enduring importance of people

The October 1 programme also examined how AI changes technical insurance roles and accountability, with WTW and Chubb represented in a pricing-focused panel. That is an important signal: faster analysis must still support expertise, challenge and professional responsibility.

Our actuarial AI approach attracted interest at ITC because the business questions are substantial. How can teams prepare data more efficiently, investigate movements, compare assumptions and explain results? AegisNow gives us a platform for exploring these needs with insurers, while qualified actuaries retain ownership of methods and conclusions.

People also determine whether an implementation succeeds. Teams need training, a clear understanding of what an agent may do, and confidence that they can question its output. Genellipse can help partners design those responsibilities alongside the technology.

How Genellipse turns conference interest into a delivery plan

Our next step with prospective partners is to select a business problem with a named owner and an agreed baseline. AegisNow can support conversations around insurance operations, reinsurance and actuarial work. Cortex AI OS brings agent development, deployment and governance into scope. GeneData supports the data foundation, with our advisory and engineering teams connecting the work to the organization’s systems.

We then define a practical workflow, identify required data and interfaces, and agree security, human approval and exception-handling controls. Success measures might include preparation time, reconciliation effort, rework, evidence completeness or service turnaround. These are measures to establish together, not promised results from the conference.

A focused MVP can target delivery within six weeks where scope, access to data and approvals permit. The next decision should follow evidence from that work: refine the approach, expand it responsibly or address a dependency before proceeding.

This is how I want Genellipse to build partnerships: understand the problem, remain accountable through implementation, and help the organization develop a capability it can sustain.

FROM PERSPECTIVE TO PRACTICE

A positive conclusion—and an invitation to continue

ITC Vegas was a successful conference for Genellipse. I leave with appreciation for the interest in Cortex AI OS and AegisNow, and with a clear commitment to follow through on the conversations we started.

My outlook is positive because the opportunity is concrete: better access to information, less repetitive preparation, more consistent processes and more time for professionals to focus on difficult decisions. The lasting outcome will depend on the work we do together after the event.

If we met at ITC, thank you. If we did not have the opportunity to connect, I would welcome a conversation. Reach our team at genellipse.com or info@genellipse.com, and let us discuss the insurance, AI or data challenge you want to solve.

Connect with Genellipse after ITC
Abdollah DehnashiFounder and CEOGenellipse

THE BIGGER PICTURE

Explore by topic

Choose a theme. Explore the discussions. Find a practical next step for your organization.

LET’S TALK ABOUT YOUR PRIORITIES

Bring us a business problem worth solving.

Explore a partnership around your organization’s priorities, with the people, processes, and measures of success at the center.

Discuss your use case