GENELLIPSE
Bring frameworks, controls, evidence, vendor risk, and audits together, with AI assistance for the work between reviews.
GeneComply connects everyday compliance activity with the evidence behind it. Give compliance teams, reviewers, and auditors a shared view of controls, policies, risk, and readiness.
Confirm the capabilities and configuration appropriate to your requirements.
Map controls across frameworks such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, and NIST CSF so related requirements can share supporting evidence.
Track policies, vendor assessments, and evidence freshness, with monitoring that helps surface changes for review.
Use AI-assisted drafting and assessments, approval workflows, and tamper-evident activity records to prepare for audit conversations.
Genellipse plans a focused MVP within 6 weeks. Agree the outcome, interfaces, access, client reviewers, and acceptance criteria at the start. Use the delivered evidence to decide the next stage.
A named process owner, representative examples, current measures, and the constraints the solution must meet.
An agreed workflow, tested configuration, findings, operational responsibilities, and a recommendation for the next phase.
Evaluate one control obligation from interpretation to evidence, review, remediation, and reporting. The goal is to reduce fragmented assurance work while preserving accountability for the underlying control.
Agree the applicable framework, jurisdiction, scope, and control interpretation with responsible specialists. Link obligations to processes and control owners.
Define evidence type, source, period, freshness, and reviewer. Reuse appropriate evidence across mapped obligations while retaining the differences in scope.
Record findings, remediation owners, due dates, approvals, and residual risk. Produce a reviewable view of what is supported and what remains unresolved.
Assurance evidence can contain sensitive system details, personal information, and privileged material. Define access, segregation of duties, retention, evidence integrity, and approved export routes. Mapping a control does not prove that it operates effectively.
Confirm framework coverage and configuration during scoping. Assess evidence connectors, source permissions, freshness, version retention, and links to existing audit or risk systems.
Flag outdated or contradictory evidence and avoid automatically closing a finding based on an AI summary. Qualified owners interpret obligations and accept residual risk.
Measure evidence preparation effort, overdue actions, rejected evidence, repeat findings, and time to establish an accurate control status. Count validated coverage rather than the number of uploaded files.
Bring a defined assurance scope, sample obligations, control register, evidence examples, review cycle, and current remediation backlog.
Include obligation-to-control mapping, evidence lineage, review decisions, unresolved gaps, access tests, and a repeatable reporting process.